Extra Topics

Last updated on 2024-09-04 | Edit this page

Rules of Debugging


  1. Fail early, fail often.
  2. Always initialize from data.
  3. Know what it’s supposed to do.
  4. Make it fail every time.
  5. Make it fail fast.
  6. Change one thing at a time, for a reason.
  7. Keep track of what we’ve done.
  8. Be humble.
  9. Test the simple things first.

And remember, a week of hard work can sometimes save you an hour of thought.

The Call Stack


Let’s take a closer look at what happens when we call fahr_to_celsius(32.0). To make things clearer, we’ll start by putting the initial value 32.0 in a variable and store the final result in one as well:

PYTHON

original = 32.0
final = fahr_to_celsius(original)

The diagram below shows what memory looks like after the first line has been executed:

Call Stack (Initial State)

When we call fahr_to_celsius, Python doesn’t create the variable temp right away. Instead, it creates something called a stack frame to keep track of the variables defined by fahr_to_kelvin. Initially, this stack frame only holds the value of temp:

Call Stack Immediately After First Function Call

When we call fahr_to_kelvin inside fahr_to_celsius, Python creates another stack frame to hold fahr_to_kelvin’s variables:

Call Stack During First Nested Function Call

It does this because there are now two variables in play called temp: the parameter to fahr_to_celsius, and the parameter to fahr_to_kelvin. Having two variables with the same name in the same part of the program would be ambiguous, so Python (and every other modern programming language) creates a new stack frame for each function call to keep that function’s variables separate from those defined by other functions.

When the call to fahr_to_kelvin returns a value, Python throws away fahr_to_kelvin’s stack frame and creates a new variable in the stack frame for fahr_to_celsius to hold the temperature in Kelvin:

Call Stack After Return From First Nested Function Call

It then calls kelvin_to_celsius, which means it creates a stack frame to hold that function’s variables:

Call Stack During Call to Second Nested Function

Once again, Python throws away that stack frame when kelvin_to_celsius is done and creates the variable result in the stack frame for fahr_to_celsius:

Call Stack After Second Nested Function Returns

Finally, when fahr_to_celsius is done, Python throws away its stack frame and puts its result in a new variable called final that lives in the stack frame we started with:

Call Stack After All Functions Have Finished

This final stack frame is always there; it holds the variables we defined outside the functions in our code. What it doesn’t hold is the variables that were in the various stack frames. If we try to get the value of temp after our functions have finished running, Python tells us that there’s no such thing:

PYTHON

print('final value of temp after all function calls:', temp)

ERROR

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NameError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-12-ffd9b4dbd5f1> in <module>()
----> 1 print('final value of temp after all function calls:', temp)

NameError: name 'temp' is not defined

OUTPUT

final value of temp after all function calls:

Why go to all this trouble? Well, here’s a function called span that calculates the difference between the minimum and maximum values in an array:

PYTHON

import numpy

def span(a):
    diff = numpy.amax(a) - numpy.amin(a)
    return diff

data = numpy.loadtxt(fname='inflammation-01.csv', delimiter=',')
print('span of data:', span(data))

OUTPUT

span of data: 20.0

Notice that span assigns a value to a variable called diff. We might very well use a variable with the same name to hold data:

PYTHON

diff = numpy.loadtxt(fname='inflammation-01.csv', delimiter=',')
print('span of data:', span(diff))

OUTPUT

span of data: 20.0

We don’t expect diff to have the value 20.0 after this function call, so the name diff cannot refer to the same thing inside span as it does in the main body of our program. And yes, we could probably choose a different name than diff in our main program in this case, but we don’t want to have to read every line of NumPy to see what variable names its functions use before calling any of those functions, just in case they change the values of our variables.

The big idea here is encapsulation, and it’s the key to writing correct, comprehensible programs. A function’s job is to turn several operations into one so that we can think about a single function call instead of a dozen or a hundred statements each time we want to do something. That only works if functions don’t interfere with each other; if they do, we have to pay attention to the details once again, which quickly overloads our short-term memory.

Following the Call Stack

We previously wrote functions called fence and outer. Draw a diagram showing how the call stack changes when we run the following:

PYTHON

print(outer(fence('carbon', '+')))

Image Grids


Let’s start by creating some simple heat maps of our own using a library called ipythonblocks. The first step is to create our own “image”:

PYTHON

from ipythonblocks import ImageGrid

Unlike the import statements we have seen earlier, this one doesn’t load the entire ipythonblocks library. Instead, it just loads ImageGrid from that library, since that’s the only thing we need (for now).

Once we have ImageGrid loaded, we can use it to create a very simple grid of colored cells:

PYTHON

grid = ImageGrid(5, 3)
grid.show()
Grid of black squares with white outlines, 5 across by 3 down, demonstrating ImageGrid

Just like a NumPy array, an ImageGrid has some properties that hold information about it:

PYTHON

print('grid width:', grid.width)
print('grid height:', grid.height)
print('grid lines on:', grid.lines_on)

OUTPUT

grid width: 5
grid height: 3
grid lines on: True

The obvious thing to do with a grid like this is color in its cells, but in order to do that, we need to know how computers represent color. The most common schemes are RGB, which is short for “red, green, blue”. RGB is an additive color model: every shade is some combination of red, green, and blue intensities. We can think of these three values as being the axes in a cube:

RGB Color Cube

An RGB color is an example of a multi-part value: like a Cartesian coordinate, it is one thing with several parts. We can represent such a value in Python using a tuple, which we write using parentheses instead of the square brackets used for a list:

PYTHON

position = (12.3, 45.6)
print('position is:', position)
color = (10, 20, 30)
print('color is:', color)

OUTPUT

position is: (12.3, 45.6)
color is: (10, 20, 30)

We can select elements from tuples using indexing, just as we do with lists and arrays:

PYTHON

print('first element of color is:', color[0])

OUTPUT

first element of color is: 10

Unlike lists and arrays, though, tuples cannot be changed after they are created — in technical terms, they are immutable:

PYTHON

color[0] = 40
print('first element of color after change:', color[0])

ERROR

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-11-9c3dd30a4e52> in <module>()
----> 1 color[0] = 40
2 print('first element of color after change:', color[0])

TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment

If a tuple represents an RGB color, its red, green, and blue components can take on values between 0 and 255. The upper bound may seem odd, but it’s the largest number that can be represented in an 8-bit byte (i.e., 28-1). This makes it easy for computers to manipulate colors, while providing fine enough gradations to fool most human eyes, most of the time.

Let’s see what a few RGB colors actually look like:

PYTHON

row = ImageGrid(8, 1)
row[0, 0] = (0, 0, 0)   # no color => black
row[1, 0] = (255, 255, 255) # all colors => white
row[2, 0] = (255, 0, 0) # all red
row[3, 0] = (0, 255, 0) # all green
row[4, 0] = (0, 0, 255) # all blue
row[5, 0] = (255, 255, 0) # red and green
row[6, 0] = (255, 0, 255) # red and blue
row[7, 0] = (0, 255, 255) # green and blue
row.show()
Row of 8 squares colored black, white, red, lime green, blue, yellow, fuchsia, and cyan

Simple color values like (0,255,0) are easy enough to decipher with a bit of practice, but what color is (214,90,127)? To help us, ipythonblocks provides a function called show_color:

PYTHON

from ipythonblocks import show_color
show_color(214, 90, 127)
show ipythonblocks example

It also provides a table of standard colors:

PYTHON

from ipythonblocks import colors
c = ImageGrid(3, 2)
c[0, 0] = colors['Fuchsia']
c[0, 1] = colors['Salmon']
c[1, 0] = colors['Orchid']
c[1, 1] = colors['Lavender']
c[2, 0] = colors['LimeGreen']
c[2, 1] = colors['HotPink']
c.show()
3 by 2 grid of colored squares. Row1: salmon, lavender, hot-pink. Row2: fuchsia, orchid, lime-green

Making a Colorbar

Fill in the ____ in the code below to create a bar that changes color from dark blue to black.

PYTHON

bar = ImageGrid(10, 1)
for x in range(10):
    bar[x, 0] = (0, 0, ____)
bar.show()

Why RGB?

Why do computers use red, green, and blue as their primary colors?

Nested Loops

Will changing the nesting of the loops in the code above — i.e., wrapping the Y-axis loop around the X-axis loop — change the final image? Why or why not?

Where to Change Data

Why did we transpose our data outside our heat map function? Why not have the function perform the transpose?

Return Versus Display

Why does the heat map function return the grid rather than displaying it immediately? Do you think this is a good or bad design choice?